A Framework of 'Epistemicide': Contrasting Malala's Philosophy of Educational Empowerment with the Taliban's Systematic Destruction of Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63468/jpsa.3.3.104Keywords:
Epistemicide, Malala Yousafzai, Taliban, female education, epistemic justice, knowledge destruction, gender apartheid, Pakistan, AfghanistanAbstract
This study examines the profound ideological confrontation between the worldwide campaign for girls' education by Malala Yousafzai and the Taliban's systematic scourge against the intellectual lives of women through the prism of epistemicide, the systematic annihilation of knowledge regimes. I employ a blend of postcolonial theory, feminist philosophy, and human rights scholarship to suggest that the Taliban is not just a set of repressive regulations. Their policies are a calculated assault on a complete mode of knowing and being among women to abolish their critical and independent thinking, their ability to act without dependence, and to preserve their historical memory. Against this backdrop, the continued work of Malala Yousafzai is, to me, an exemplar of epistemic justice in real life. I place her activism as a counter-philosophy that is needed to reclaim education as a liberation tool useful in enabling people to think critically and contribute to creating a more peaceful society. Comparing both pieces of evidence, Afghanistan and Pakistan, I demonstrate that the struggle to educate girls is not about a normal policy discussion. It reveals the conflict as the struggle concerning the most basic human right, the right to know, to speak, and to live as completely autonomous, intellectually capable human beings.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maira Sadaqat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



